<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Build Tooling on JVQ.net: Just Very Quick</title>
    <link>https://jvq.net/tags/build-tooling/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Build Tooling on JVQ.net: Just Very Quick</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://jvq.net/tags/build-tooling/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>I Ran Six Static Site Generators on the Same 400 Posts. Build Time Wasn&#39;t the Differentiator.</title>
      <link>https://jvq.net/i-ran-six-static-site-generators-on-the-same-400-posts.-build-time-wasnt-the-differentiator./</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://jvq.net/i-ran-six-static-site-generators-on-the-same-400-posts.-build-time-wasnt-the-differentiator./</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Every static site generator comparison opens with build times, and every one of them is measuring the thing that matters least. I took the same corpus, four hundred markdown files with frontmatter, images, tags and a couple of taxonomies, and pushed it through six generators to see what actually differed.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Build time differed by more than an order of magnitude. It changed nothing about which one I would pick.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;the-setup&#34;&gt;The setup&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Same content directory, copied six times. Same images, same frontmatter schema, same target output: a paginated index, per-post pages, tag archives, an RSS feed and a sitemap. Minimal theming, because theme complexity dominates build time in most generators and I wanted to compare the engines rather than my CSS.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
